Subject: Re: 0.65/AIX
From: Kurt Hornik (Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at)
Date: Wed 14 Jul 1999 - 02:02:41 EST
>>>>> Martin Maechler writes:
ToV> Sorry, but why do you need _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED to be defined? And
ToV> why does -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=2 work, albeit noisely?
> This is used to be the only flag (from the many I tried about a year ago)
> for which
> worked .
Hmm ... Compilation-wise it seems that -D_ALL_SOURCE works o.k. for me.
Now, this gives
> 1/0 + 1/0# Inf
> 1/0 - 1/0# NaN
which is only sort of o.k.???
For the time being, I'll commit this version ...
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue 04 Jan 2000 - 14:16:05 EST