Subject: Re: glm code bug (PR#224)
Date: Wed 14 Jul 1999 - 10:01:47 EST
> On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 Bill.Venables@cmis.csiro.au wrote:
> > Peter,
> [Peter only fixes most of the bugs....]
> > There is a clear and simple bug in glm() that I have noticed in
> > 0.64.2 (Windows and Unix) but may have been present in earlier
> > versions.
> It has a long history: the expand.dots = FALSE was introduced in 0.63,
> but the second call has been wrong for longer.
> > The two marked lines should clearly be
> > call <- match.call()
> > and
> > mf <- match.call(expand.dots = FALSE)
> as in S.
> I've committed this for 0.65.0.
> We have had various discussions about glm: it is proving very hard to
> maintain (that is, find the bugs) and is irritatingly different from S.
> One option is to reimplement it.
My opinion as a simple user ... reimplement glm is a very good idea!. Just
for the "cosmetic" point of view: please, take out all of these silly *`s
indicating significant levels in the output. Also, if somebody needs the "null
deviance" make it as optional, and not in the stardard output.
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue 04 Jan 2000 - 14:16:05 EST