Subject: Re: R 0.65 and AIX: if it quacks like a duck...
From: Prof Brian D Ripley (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue 20 Jul 1999 - 16:37:27 EST
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Thomas Vogels wrote:
> this relates to R-devel of 1999/July/18. I will outline what I had
> to change to get R to compile with cc then with gcc. Note that R
> compiled with cc works, R compiled with gcc is broken.
> 3) Edit src/unix/system.c: need a "break;" after default: in line 752
> (yes, won't compile without)
There is no longer a line 752, but this was added (by Kurt) in the current
sources (line 317). When I saw this I checked my books and all my lint-like
tools: the code I wrote does seem valid C according to all my checks.
Would just ";" satisfy your compiler?
> --> Compile with gcc:
> 1) 2) 3) 4) like above
Will gcc really not accept 3) on your platform? It does on all of mine,
in all the versions of gcc I tried. It would be a surprise for gcc's
parser to be platform-specific.
-- Brian D. Ripley, email@example.com Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: firstname.lastname@example.org _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue 04 Jan 2000 - 14:16:06 EST