Subject: Re: Preliminary version of ts package
From: Paul Gilbert (email@example.com)
Date: Wed 28 Jul 1999 - 06:23:33 EST
>In general, I am not trying to clone S, most notably as S-PLUS uses class
>rts not ts, so very little code exists that uses S's class ts. Surely the
>point of R is not _better_? There are lots of detail improvements,
>with more to come.
Yes, hopefully there will be lots of improvements. But I think everyone has
agreed that we want S compatability for the default behaviour, so if "ts" is
not going to be the default, then the default needs to be defined. Then, for
example, we cannot have
start.default <- function (x) start.ts(ts(x))
as it is now.
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue 04 Jan 2000 - 14:16:06 EST