Subject: Re: ts and defaults
From: Prof Brian D Ripley (email@example.com)
Date: Sat 07 Aug 1999 - 06:10:58 EST
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> >The plan is to separate the the default methods from the
> >ts class methods. We do not consider that S compatibility applies
> >to class ts, which S does not have.
> The other part of the problem is that the function name ts() has already been
> appropriated as the constructor for the default, so you can't use ts() as the
> constructor for your "ts" class. Ditto for is.ts, as.ts, etc.
Or to put it another way, as I said before, ts() in R is incompatible
with ts() in S, and the name has already been taken for the constructor
of the R ts class. (In case you still do not get it, there is already
an R ts class.) Do you want us to change ts in R not to be the constructor
of the ts class, and thereby `break a lot of user code' in R?
-- Brian D. Ripley, firstname.lastname@example.org Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: email@example.com _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue 04 Jan 2000 - 14:16:07 EST