Subject: Re: diag()
From: Martin Maechler (email@example.com)
Date: Sat 04 Sep 1999 - 08:43:55 EST
PD> Martin Maechler <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Your proposal has been (slightly improved) and commited for 0.64.1
>> NEWS has
>> o diag(x) now keeps names when appropriate and barfs when x is an
PD> - unless it's of dimension 2, you mean.
PD> But is this really
PD> desirable for the 1d case? diag(array(1:9)) used to work like
PD> diag(1:9), but is now an error. E.g. the output of table() can be a
PD> 1d array.
But I think that people may expect something else from diag(<array>).
I don't mind letting the 1D case still go by, but certainly not d >= 3 !
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue 04 Jan 2000 - 14:16:08 EST