pch==NA (PR#366)

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: pch==NA (PR#366)
p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk
Date: Thu 09 Dec 1999 - 03:33:55 EST


Message-Id: <199912081733.SAA22746@pubhealth.ku.dk>

Try this:

plot(1:3,pch=c(1,2,NA))

The 3rd point is plotted as if pch were 1. This seems completely wrong
to me. Similar issue with cex= (you get the minimum size plotting dot
for the NA case there). With col= the point disappears, as I tend it
should in the other cases as well.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue 04 Jan 2000 - 14:16:11 EST