**Subject: **pch==NA (PR#366)

*p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk*

**Date: **Thu 09 Dec 1999 - 03:33:55 EST

**Next message:**maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch: "plot math - segfault and "frac", "^" bug(s).. (PR#368)"**Previous message:**maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch: "plot math - segfault and "frac", "^" bug(s).. (PR#365)"

Message-Id: <199912081733.SAA22746@pubhealth.ku.dk>

Try this:

plot(1:3,pch=c(1,2,NA))

The 3rd point is plotted as if pch were 1. This seems completely wrong

to me. Similar issue with cex= (you get the minimum size plotting dot

for the NA case there). With col= the point disappears, as I tend it

should in the other cases as well.

-- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

**Next message:**maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch: "plot math - segfault and "frac", "^" bug(s).. (PR#368)"**Previous message:**maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch: "plot math - segfault and "frac", "^" bug(s).. (PR#365)"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25
: Tue 04 Jan 2000 - 14:16:11 EST
*