[R] Efficiency question

From: Worik R <worikr_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:53:50 +1200

Given the following snippet....
 m.nf.xts <- xts(rep(0, length(index(m.xts))), order.by=index(m.xts))

Does R know to cache the index(m.xts) or is it more efficient to say...

m.i <- index(m.xts)
 m.nf.xts <- xts(rep(0, length(m.i)), order.by=index(m.i))



        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Tue 08 Jun 2010 - 21:55:55 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 09 Jun 2010 - 11:20:28 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive