Re: [Rd] coxph and drop1

From: Terry Therneau <>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:56:16 -0500

On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 12:52 -0400, John Fox wrote:
> Dear Terry,
> Possibly I'm missing something, but since the generic drop1() doesn't have a test argument, why is there a problem?
> > args(drop1)
> function (object, scope, ...)
> If you use match.arg() against test, then the error message should be informative if one of the prescribed values isn't supplied.
> Best,
> John
> ------------------------------------------------
> John Fox

I stand corrected. I was looking at the help page and focused my eyes on the "default" and "lm" versions, both of which have the test argument with options none and chisq. I should have looked higher on the page.

Terry T. mailing list Received on Mon 14 Mar 2011 - 18:02:27 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Mon 14 Mar 2011 - 19:00:30 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive