Re: [Rd] Detecting bad lexical scoping

From: Duncan Murdoch <>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:08:54 -0400

On 16/03/2011 4:14 PM, Ryan King wrote:
> I've recently hunted down a troublesome bug in my own code, and am
> looking for an easy mechanism to detect this kind of error in other R
> code. The problem was an undefined variable inside of a function.
> Unfortunately, R looked for that variable in the global environment
> and found it since there was variable with that name in my testing
> scripts (note to self: do not name things "x").
> Is there an easy way to report all the non-local objects accessed in a
> function?

The problem is that all base functions are non-local objects, so you probably don't want to do exactly that, but the codetools package can do it (using tools::findGlobals) and also provides help in identifying errors. You say you keep your code in a package (which is a good idea) so you should run "R CMD check" on the package. If your code is not in a package, use tools::checkUsage or related functions.

> Is there any easy way around the usual scoping rules? I want to be
> able to get to base functions, and am willing to namespace:: or :::
> access all of my own functions (it's in a package) if necessary to
> block the standard scoping rules. The language def section on
> environments made me hurt.

Quoting Uwe Ligges, "No".

Duncan Murdoch mailing list Received on Thu 17 Mar 2011 - 09:14:43 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Thu 17 Mar 2011 - 09:20:33 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive