Re: [Rd] Detecting bad lexical scoping

From: Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:47:46 -0400

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ryan King <c.ryan.king_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I've recently hunted down a troublesome bug in my own code, and am
> looking for an easy mechanism to detect this kind of error in other R
> code.  The problem was an undefined variable inside of a function.
> Unfortunately, R looked for that variable in the global environment
> and found it since there was variable with that name in my testing
> scripts (note to self: do not name things "x").
>
> Is there an easy way to report all the non-local objects accessed in a
> function?
>
> Is there any easy way around the usual scoping rules?  I want to be
> able to get to base functions, and am willing to namespace:: or :::
> access all of my own functions (it's in a package) if necessary to
> block the standard scoping rules.  The language def section on
> environments made me hurt.
>

One way is discussed in the Feb 27, 2010 news item on the proto home page: http://r-proto.googlecode.com

-- 
Statistics & Software Consulting
GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc.
tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP
email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Thu 17 Mar 2011 - 12:52:20 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Thu 17 Mar 2011 - 14:40:35 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive