Re: [Rd] Standardized Pearson residuals

From: peter dalgaard <pdalgd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:54 +0100

On Mar 17, 2011, at 20:46 , Brett Presnell wrote:

>
> John Maindonald <john.maindonald@anu.edu.au> writes:
>

>> One can easily test for the binary case and not give the statistic in
>> that case.
>> 
>> A general point is that if one gave no output that was not open to
>> abuse, there'd be nothing given at all!

>
> Thanks John. I've been reluctant to push too hard for this on r-devel,
> but this is more or less the point I made to Peter in a private email.

Well, r-devel is the discussion club. If you push people there, they can move away....

Anyways, I have committed the new rstandard(); to r-devel for now, if nothing falls on its face, we can move it to R 2.13.0 alpha before it goes to beta on March 30.

        -p

-- 
Peter Dalgaard
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd.mes_at_cbs.dk  Priv: PDalgd_at_gmail.com

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Fri 18 Mar 2011 - 07:12:28 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Fri 18 Mar 2011 - 17:10:32 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive