Re: [R] High standard error

From: John Kane <jrkrideau_at_yahoo.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:25:56 -0800 (PST)


Sure why not?

You do realize, do you not that no one has the slightest idea of what you are doing?

PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

> From: danielepippo <danzur_at_hotmail.it>
> Subject: [R] High standard error
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Received: Tuesday, March 1, 2011, 9:07 AM
> Hi to everyone,
>    
>      if the estimate of the parameter
> results in 0.196 and his standard
> error is 0.426, can I say that this parameter is not
> significant for the
> model?
>
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Pippo
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/High-standard-error-tp3329903p3329903.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Tue 01 Mar 2011 - 14:28:46 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Tue 01 Mar 2011 - 14:30:17 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive