Re: [R] Does R have a "const object"?

From: Barry Rowlingson <b.rowlingson_at_lancaster.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:41:42 +0000

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:16 PM, <luke-tierney_at_uiowa.edu> wrote:

> That would defeat the purpose.  Unlocking things in base may be useful
> for experimenting or debugging but it is not a good idea otherwise.

 You are making experimenting in R more awkward? Then I'm throwing "That would defeat the purpose" straight back at you. I remember when R was all about the experimenting. Of course it was called Splus back then and was only available in grainy black-and-white...

 Oh well, I guess its one small step towards becoming a proper grown-up language.

Barry



R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Wed 16 Mar 2011 - 16:55:16 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 16 Mar 2011 - 17:10:22 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive