Re: [R] best practice(s) for retrieving a local variable from a closure

From: Barry Rowlingson <b.rowlingson_at_lancaster.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 20:27:35 +0100

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Benjamin Tyner <btyner_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>> The above feels a bit like snooping where I wasn't invited.
>> You could do something like
>>  mq <- function(a) {
>>     force(a)
>>     list(getA = function()a,
>>          setA = function(newA) a <<- newA,
>>          fun = function(x)x^a
>>     )
>>  }
>> to make it clear that you expect people to look at or change
>> fun's 'a'.

 Once you start doing a lot of that though you may as well go the whole OO hog and use the proto or R.oo packages...

Barry



R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Sat 09 Apr 2011 - 19:30:50 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Sat 09 Apr 2011 - 20:00:29 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive