Re: [R] GLM and normality of predictors

From: Sacha Viquerat <tweedie-d_at_web.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:05:58 +0200

Am 15.04.2011 20:14, schrieb Christian Hennig:
> Normality of the predictors doesn't belong to the assumptions of the
> GLM, so you don't have to check this.
>
> Note, however, that there are all kinds of potential problems which to
> detect is fairly hopeless with n=11 and three predictors, so you
> shouldn't be too confident about your results anyway.
>
> Christian
>
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Simone Santoro wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have found quite a few posts on normality checking of response
>> variables, but I am still in doubt about that. As it is easy to
>> understand I'm not a statistician so be patient please.
>> I want to estimate the possible effects of some predictors on my
>> response variable that is n? of males and n? of females
>> (cbind(males,females)), so, it would be:
>>
>> fullmodel<-glm(cbind(males,females)~pred1+pred2+pred3, binomial)
>>
>> I have n= 11 (ecological data, small sample size is a a frequent
>> problem!).
>>
>> Someone told me that I have to check for normality of the predictors
>> (and in case transform to reach normality) but I am in doubt about the
>> fact that a normality test can be very informative with such a small
>> sample size.
>> Also, I have read that a normality test (Shapiro, Kolmogornov, Durbin,
>> etc.) can't tell you anything about the fact that the distribution is
>> normal but just that there is no evidence for non-normality.
>> Anyway, I am still looking for some sort of thumb of rule to be used
>> in these cases.
>>
>> The question: is there some simple advice on the way one should
>> proceed in this cases to be reasonably confident of the results?
>>
>> Thanks for any help you might provide
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>>
>
> *** --- ***
> Christian Hennig
> University College London, Department of Statistical Science
> Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, phone +44 207 679 1698
> chrish_at_stats.ucl.ac.uk, www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~ucakche
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
if you count no of males and females, shouldn't you choose the poisson family? maybe whoever you told you to check for normality referred to that, since count data are not normally distributed (neither are their errors)! maybe thats all he/she wants!



R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Fri 15 Apr 2011 - 19:08:49 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Fri 15 Apr 2011 - 22:40:30 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive