Re: [R] R licence

From: peter dalgaard <>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:58:09 +0200

On Apr 7, 2011, at 16:36 , Matthew Dowle wrote:

> Duncan,
> Letting you know then that I just don't see how the first paragraph here :
> is compatible with clause 2(b) here :
> Perhaps somebody could explain why it is?

As I understand it, they believe that it falls under the "mere aggregation" exception at the end of sec.2, and they believe that their plugins are not "derived works", but add-ons. The legal hair-splitting is rather painful...

Peter Dalgaard
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email:  Priv:

______________________________________________ mailing list
PLEASE do read the posting guide
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Received on Thu 07 Apr 2011 - 15:00:45 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Thu 07 Apr 2011 - 15:20:29 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive