Re: [Rd] S3 methods in default namespace

From: Uwe Ligges <>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:37:52 +0200

On 29.08.2011 14:20, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>> So doesn't that break packages that use S3 but don't have a NAMESPACE?
>> Maybe, but since the methods are exported as functions they are also found
>> for method dispatch and imported, if another package imports from the
>> Namspace. The problem I see is what happens if method dispatch is done on a
>> package that is not attached but just the Namespace is only loaded.
>> Anyway, we should really recommend that package authors write NAMESPACE
>> files in case their packages are not trivial.
>> Note that there are many CRAN packages that fail under R-devel, some of them
>> sue to NAMESPACE issues.
> I'm not sure I understand the approach of providing a default
> NAMESPACE. Why not just make it a requirement to pass R CMD check?
> That seems like it would be a safer approach, although it would create
> some work for people who have not yet started using namespaces.

Making it an requirement would certainly be the cleanest approach, but there are other constraints. One of them CRAN maintainability. Example: Consider some people do not fix packages in time that are in the list of dependencies of others, then the whole hierarchy is broken. We try to make the transition a bit more smoothly.


> Hadley
> mailing list Received on Mon 29 Aug 2011 - 12:39:25 GMT

This quarter's messages: by month, or sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

All messages

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Mon 29 Aug 2011 - 17:00:24 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive