Re: [Rd] requesting a new SIG mailing list

From: Sarah Goslee <>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:21:43 -0500


I'm one of the maintainers of the r-sig-ecology list, and I think it would be entirely appropriate to include hydrology within the scope of the list.

There hasn't been much hydrologic discussion, as you noted, but not because we wish to exclude it.


On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini <> wrote:

> Another possibility could be to use the R-sig-ecology, which seems to be
> more related to hydrology:
> "analytical techniques and topics that are appropriate for discussion on
> R-sig-ecology are quite broad. For examples of what might be appropriate for
> discussion on this list, please see the Environmentrics Task View
> ("
> (taken from:
> However, I did a quick search on the archives of 'R-sig-ecology' for the
> year 2011, and I could only found one single mail related to hydrology:
> (in the same search I couldn't find any single reference to hydrology in the
> R-sig-geo during the year 2011)

Sarah Goslee

______________________________________________ mailing list
Received on Tue 14 Feb 2012 - 17:23:38 GMT

This quarter's messages: by month, or sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

All messages

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Fri 17 Feb 2012 - 07:00:17 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive