Re: [Rd] On R performance

From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:28:30 -0600


On 8 March 2012 at 11:06, Justin Talbot wrote:
| I've been working on an R performance academic project for the last
| couple years which has involved writing an interpreter for R from
| scratch and a JIT for R vector operations.

Cool. I think John mention that once or twice and I promptly forgot.

Can you share some numbers?  

| So why is R performance poor now? I think the fundamental reason is
| related to software engineering: R is nearly impossible to experiment
| with, so no one tries out new performance techniques on it. There are

Did you compare notes with the CXXR project by Andrew Runnalls and his student(s)? See

| I see little value is debating changes to the language semantics until
| we've addressed this low hanging fruit and at least tried to make the
| current R/S semantics run fast.

Fully agree.

I'd add that helping expand R via the FFI also works, though it is of course not as easy on the end user as making the core faster.


"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too
dark to read." -- Groucho Marx

______________________________________________ mailing list
Received on Fri 09 Mar 2012 - 15:33:02 GMT

This quarter's messages: by month, or sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

All messages

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Sat 10 Mar 2012 - 14:30:27 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive