Re: [Rd] CRAN test / avoidance

From: Spencer Graves <>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:57:32 -0700

On 9/19/2012 11:51 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> The question becomes: how does information get passed along to indicate
>> things that may take a long time to run. The discussion so far has focused
>> on developers setting, or using, some flags to indicate tests and examples
>> that take a long time. Another option would be to have the check/build
>> process generate a file with information about the time it took to run
>> tests, vignettes, and examples, probably with some information about the
>> speed of the machine it was run on. Then CRAN and anyone else that wants to
>> run tests can take this information into consideration.
> To paraphrase Uwe (fortunes::fortune(192)): computing is cheap and
> thinking hurts.
> I don't understand why we are spending so much time discussing what
> probably amounts (at most) to a couple of thousand of dollars of
> compute time.

       I raised the question, because CRAN maintainers rejected the latest version of "fda" because some of the examples took too long to run on their computers.


> Hadley

Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Technology Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph:  408-655-4567

______________________________________________ mailing list
Received on Wed 19 Sep 2012 - 19:01:05 GMT

This quarter's messages: by month, or sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

All messages

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 19 Sep 2012 - 21:30:42 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive