[Rd] Unevaluated .Call

From: Hadley Wickham <h.wickham_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:13:16 -0500


Hi all,

Is there an equivalent to .Call that passes the unevaluated arguments? (e.g. like the equivalent of .Interval + eval = 10 in names.c)

If not, are there any disadvantages to doing something like this?

myfun <- function(...) {
  .Call("myfun", match.call(), parent.env()) }

Thanks!

Hadley

-- 
RStudio / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Fri 12 Oct 2012 - 03:16:36 GMT

This quarter's messages: by month, or sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

All messages

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Fri 12 Oct 2012 - 03:20:46 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive