Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

From: Friedrich Leisch <>
Date: Wed 20 Sep 2006 - 06:43:31 GMT

>>>>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:39 -0500, >>>>> Marc Schwartz (MS) wrote:

> Hi all,
> On FC5, using:

> Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829)

> and today's

> R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397)

> with the following .Rnw file:

> \documentclass[10pt]{article}
> \begin{document}

> This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1}
> %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1}

> \end{document}

> The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the line is
> commented. This results in the following .tex file content (in the case
> of R 2.4.0):

> \documentclass[10pt]{article}
> \usepackage{/home/marcs/R.Files/SourceCode/R-alpha/share/texmf/Sweave}
> \begin{document}

> This line should print '2': 2
> %% This line should NOT print '2': 2

> \end{document}

> Shouldn't Sweave just generally ignore commented LaTeX code? In
> reviewing Sweave.R I did not see a check for this, so perhaps there are
> circumstances where one wants a \Sexpr in commented LaTeX code
> processed. An example escapes me at the moment however.

Sweave does not parse the LaTeX part of the document at all (which makes it a lot easier), all it does is looking for its own "magic strings" and replacing those, wherever they might occur.

If we would start to respect comments, we would need a some kind of parser for LaTeX, which we currently don't need ... and starting to parse LaTeX would also open a can of worms of possible requests (what to do with Sexpr inside verbatim, etc, etc).

Fritz mailing list Received on Wed Sep 20 16:45:36 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Wed 20 Sep 2006 - 10:30:08 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.