Re: [Rd] A possible improvement to apropos

From: Martin Maechler <>
Date: Fri 15 Dec 2006 - 07:56:31 GMT

>>>>> "Seth" == Seth Falcon <> >>>>> on Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:16:30 -0800 writes:

    Seth> Martin Maechler <> writes:
>> Hi Seth, Could you live with typing 'i=T' (i.e.

    Seth> I can live with my ~/.Rprofile, I suppose. :-)

>> In principle, I'd like to keep the default as
>>, since we'd really should teach the
>> users that R *is* case sensitive. Ignoring case is the
>> exception in the S/R/C world, not the rule

    Seth> Let me try to argue why I think the default should be     Seth> case insensitive.

    Seth>    This is a _search_ function.  If you aren't even
    Seth> sure what something is called, how can you expect to
    Seth> know how it will be capitalized?  Making search
    Seth> functions less likely to return what the user is
    Seth> looking for seems quite odd to me.

okay, okay, yes, you've convinced me.
Thank you (and everyone else) for the feedback!

So the change will be {non-back-compatibly !} to ignore case in apropos()

For find() -- on the same help page, similar topic -- it's less clear if a change should happen along similar lines. Changing the *default* there is more problematic, since find() is used, e.g., in getAnywhere().

I will probably not get to commit my changes before the weekend, BTW. Martin

    Seth>    Learning what functions are available has higher
    Seth> precedence, IMO, than being reminded about case
    Seth> sensitivity.  Imagine a user hoping to find 'getClass'
    Seth> that doesn't always remember case-sensitivity rules:
    Seth>        apropos("class") ## Doesn't find the function
    Seth> at all. ## Writes a message to R-help without reading     Seth> the posting guide
    Seth>        APROPOS("class") ## user: "oh, that looks like
    Seth> what I want" getclass("foo") ## user: "why didn't it
    Seth> work?" ... "ah, maybe I have to spell ## it exactly"
    Seth> getClass("foo") ## happy user

    Seth>    Remember, the _results_ will be displayed in proper
    Seth> case and a common next step (should be) to read the
    Seth> man page and possibly try an example -- especially if     Seth> a first attempt fails.

    Seth> Have I made any progress?

indeed! mailing list Received on Sat Dec 16 15:24:42 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Sat 16 Dec 2006 - 04:31:02 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.