Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

From: Hin-Tak Leung <>
Date: Fri 12 Jan 2007 - 17:04:19 GMT

Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>> I'd like to know one thing though - was there any specific reason for
>> the mingw upgrade after 2.4.0, or was it just a routine
>> latest-is-greatest upgrade?
> There are specific requirements: from the CHANGES file
> 2.4.0:
> mingw-runtime >= 3.10 is required to build R (a bug fix in the handling
> of MBCS code is required). This is enforced by a check in building
> Rpwd.exe.

Argh... MBCS. I tried running wine with debug on, ( WINEDEBUG=+relay wine Rgui.exe 2>&1 ) and it shows that just before 2.4.1/2.5dev crashes, R tried to called strlen() and strchr() on "Error: invalid multibyte string" in ntdll.

Call ntdll.strlen(6c9a0a80 "Error: invalid multibyte string\n") ret=6c9150bd Call ntdll.strchr(00e192e0 "Error: invalid multibyte string\n",0000000a) ret=6c704ec0

It might be bogus, but the same trace is not found in WINEDEBUG=+relay wine Rgui.exe 2>&1
with R 2.4.0 .

Can I have a svn revision number for the MBCS change please? It should probably be the first thing I look at, as soon as I get my cross-compile tools up to date... thanks a lot.


> 2.5.0-to-be:
> mingw-runtime >= 3.11 is needed to build R.
> [There are multiple reasons, but one is that isblank is missing in
> earlier versions.]
> I am almost certain that I have build R 2.4.1 with mingw-runtime 3.10.
> mailing list Received on Sat Jan 13 04:08:30 2007

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Fri 12 Jan 2007 - 18:31:05 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.