Re: [R] zero random effect sizes with binomial lmer

From: Dieter Menne <dieter.menne_at_menne-biomed.de>
Date: Mon 01 Jan 2007 - 18:09:12 GMT

Daniel Ezra Johnson <johnson4 <at> babel.ling.upenn.edu> writes:

>
> I am fitting models to the responses to a questionnaire that has
> seven yes/no questions (Item). For each combination of Subject and
> Item, the variable Response is coded as 0 or 1.
>
> I want to include random effects for both Subject and Item. While I
> understand that the datasets are fairly small, and there are a lot of
> invariant subjects, I do not understand something that is happening
> here, and in comparing other subsets of the data.
>
> In the data below, which has been adjusted to show this phenomenon
> clearly, the Subject random effect variance is comparable for A
> (1.63) and B (1.712), but the Item random effect variance comes out
> as 0.109 for B and essentially zero for A (5.00e-10).
...

Check the list archives for quite a few postings of Professor Brian Ripley on the subject of Hauk-Donner.

Dieter



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Tue Jan 02 05:13:36 2007

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Mon 01 Jan 2007 - 20:30:34 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.