Re: [R] slightly extended lm class

From: ivo welch <ivowel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue 02 Jan 2007 - 02:23:27 GMT

obviously not. any other suggestion? of course, it would be even better if someone who knew what he is doing were to add this functionality on demand (e.g., optional parameters) to the standard lm classes. just a thought...

On 1/1/07, Michael Kubovy <kubovy@virginia.edu> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2007, at 9:00 PM, ivo welch wrote:
>
> > I have written a short lme.R function, which adds normalized
> > coefficients and White heteroskedasticity-adjusted statistics to the
> > standard output. Otherwise, it behaves like lm.
>
> Is it a good idea to call it lme, since there's a widely used lme()
> in the nlme package?
> _____________________________
> Professor Michael Kubovy
> University of Virginia
> Department of Psychology
> USPS: P.O.Box 400400 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400
> Parcels: Room 102 Gilmer Hall
> McCormick Road Charlottesville, VA 22903
> Office: B011 +1-434-982-4729
> Lab: B019 +1-434-982-4751
> Fax: +1-434-982-4766
> WWW: http://www.people.virginia.edu/~mk9y/
>
>
>



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Tue Jan 02 13:28:28 2007

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Tue 02 Jan 2007 - 03:30:28 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.