Re: [R] scripts with littler

From: John Lawrence Aspden <news_at_aspden.com>
Date: Tue 09 Jan 2007 - 21:46:41 GMT

Jeffrey Horner wrote:

>> John Lawrence Aspden wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm actually tempted to use
>>>
>> #!/usr/bin/env r
>> rm(list=ls()[ls()!="argv"])

>
> Eww!! I'm not sure you want to do that. I would recommend sticking with:
>
> #!/usr/bin/r -v
>
> as that gives you a "truer" scripting environment. I understand that
> won't load the libraries in your home area automatically, but consider
> the way scripts in other languages are written and distributed: they
> usually load the libraries at the beginning of the script. Silently
> loading them before the script is run hides behavior from the script user.
>
> If you have libraries installed outside of the library search path,
> consider expanding it with .libPaths() before calling library() or
> require().
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff

Hi, thanks, it's not that it doesn't load the libraries automatically (which I'd hate), it's that it no longer knows how to load them.

I've got a library (brainwaver), installed locally in ~/R/library, and this information is recorded in the ~/.Renviron file.

This is because there's no debian package for it, and I don't want to mess up the system by trying to install it manually as root (after all, it should be fairly obvious that I don't know what I'm doing!...)

In my script I load the library, but if I call it using #!/usr/bin/r --vanilla, this stops working.

(I can still load the system-wide libraries, it's the ones installed in my home directory that break)

Since I can't use subroutines without using the library mechanism, and I want to use brainwaver, and I want people to be able to use this stuff without needing root privileges, or needing to hack hard-coded file locations into every script, I'd prefer ~/.Renviron read.

Also, of course, using #!/usr/bin/r depends on it being installed there, and I can't use the env mechanism and still pass it the vanilla option.

My main problem with R's/littler's default behaviour is that it introduces lots of spurious variables pulled in from .Rdata that are different depending where it's invoked.

I'm aware that the rm(list... is a nasty hack, but it seems like the least bad option. Most of the other things seem to produce scripts that won't work if you tar them up and send them to people.

Thanks for the hint about .libPaths(), but without ~/.Renviron how am I to know which directories to add to it?

Of course I'm not saying that there might not be other subtle difficulties with the default. But so far I prefer the default + explicitly remove all variables to --vanilla, and I can't pass --vanilla without being sure where R's installed anyway!

Is anyone still reading by this point?? Thanks for your perseverance if so!

Cheers, John.

-- 
Contractor in Cambridge UK -- http://www.aspden.com

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Received on Wed Jan 10 08:55:01 2007

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Wed 10 Jan 2007 - 12:30:30 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.