Re: [R] $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors, returning NULL - what is the right thing to do then?

From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch_at_stats.uwo.ca>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:51:38 -0500

On 12/6/2007 7:04 AM, Søren Højsgaard wrote:
> Dear all,
> Starting from a recent version of R, the $ became "unusable" on atomic vectors, e.g.

>> x <- c(a=1,b=2)
>> x$a

> NULL
> Warning message:
> In x$a : $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors, returning NULL
>
> I can of course do
>> x['a']

> - but that requires more typing (5 characters rather than 2).
>
> Apologies if I've missed a an announcement regarding this, but
> 1) Is there an alternative to the ['a'] and
> 2) Why was this change made?

There's an announcement in the NEWS file for 2.6.0

DEPRECATED & DEFUNCT

     o	$ on an atomic vector now gives a warning that it is 'invalid'.
	It remains deprecated, but may be removed in R >= 2.7.0.

and an update in R-devel saying that in fact it has been made defunct there.

In answer to your questions:

  1. I don't think so, other than x[1].
  2. I don't remember the details, other than it was to avoid confusion. Maybe someone else can summarize the discussion?

Duncan Murdoch



R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Thu 06 Dec 2007 - 14:50:51 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Thu 06 Dec 2007 - 15:30:17 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.