Re: [R] I need arguments pro-S-PLUS and against SAS...

From: Neil Shephard <nshephard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:48:07 -0800 (PST)

You might find this article useful....

Kellie B. Keeling and Robert J. Pavur, A comparative study of the reliability of
nine statistical software packages,
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Volume 51, Issue 8, 1 May 2007, Pages
3811-3831.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8V-4JHMGWJ-1/2/77a29a95c2071997f13fcca7267711d1)

Alberto Monteiro wrote:
>
> I need arguments pro-S-PLUS and against SAS for a meeting I will
> have next week. S-Plus is (90 - 99)% compatible with R, so using
> S-Plus will make things much easier for everyone. But I can't use
> this argument. What other arguments could I use?
>
> Alberto Monteiro
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-need-arguments-pro-S-PLUS-and-against-SAS...-tp14621011p14713230.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Received on Wed 09 Jan 2008 - 14:51:40 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 09 Jan 2008 - 15:30:05 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive