[R] Weird SEs with effect()

From: Gustaf Granath <gustaf.granath_at_ebc.uu.se>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:43:04 +0100

Hi all,

Im a little bit confused concerning the effect() command, effects package. I have done several glm models with family=quasipoisson:

model <-glm(Y~X+Q+Z,family=quasipoisson)

and then used

results.effects <-effect("X",model,se=TRUE)

to get the "adjusted means". I am aware about the debate concerning adjusted means, but you guys just have to trust me - it makes sense for me.
Now I want standard error for these means.


gives me standard error, but it is now it starts to get confusing. The given standard errors are very very very small - not realistic. I thought that maybe these standard errors are not back transformed so I used exp() and then the standard errors became realistic. However, for one of my glm models with quasipoisson the standard errors make kind of sense without using exp() and gets way to big if I use exp(). To be honest, I get the feeling that Im on the wrong track here.

Basically, I want to know how SE is calculated in effect() (all I know is that the reported standard errors are for the fitted values) and if anyone knows what is going on here.


Gustaf Granath

R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Sat 16 Feb 2008 - 16:48:52 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Sun 17 Feb 2008 - 22:30:15 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive