[R] L-BFGS-B needs finite values of 'fn'

From: Zaihra T <zaihra_at_uwindsor.ca>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:08:36 -0400

   Hey paul,

    Chk out some of these points as mentioned somewhere earlier in R help too

  1. Trying to exponentiate potentially negative numbers is also asking for trouble
  2. Use lgamma() or choose() or lchoose() rather than gamma() or factorial()
  3. Worry about fnscale. It seems unlikely that all args are indeed on the same scale.
  4. Try to add and subtract logarithms in preference to multiplying and dividing as cancellations usually are more accurate and you are less likely to run into machine accuracy issues.
  5. If x's in the function are <=0 by any chance then u might wanna rewrite ur log(x) as log(ifelse(x<=0,1,x)) or log(ifelse(x<=0,x+c,x)) whre c is a very small number , depending upon whether u dont want to consider the contribution of zero or less than 0 x's in ur function or vice versa
  6. As dividing by very small numbers is also a potential killer, make sure ur fuction doesnt ! have any divisor which might be very small

   hope this helps u in fixing ur problem.

   cheers!

   Zaihra

   On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:48:47 +0100 "Paul Smith" wrote:
> Thanks, Ravi. The analytical solution, (x_1,x_2,...,x_10), should
> satisfy this equality:
>
> x_t / x_(t-1) = 0.3.
>
> Unfortunately, the procedure that you suggest does not lead to a
> solution that satisfies such an equality.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Ravi Varadhan wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > Have you tried using "BFGS" without bounds?
> >
> > sols <- optim(rep(20,nvar), f, gr, method="BFGS",
   control=list(fnscale=-1))
> >
> > This converges to a solution, although I don't know if t! he converged
> > solution is what you want.
> > ;
> > Ravi.
> >
> >



> > -------
> >
> > Ravi Varadhan, Ph.D.
> >
> > Assistant Professor, The Center on Aging and Health
> >
> > Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology
> >
> > Johns Hopkins University
> >
> > Ph: (410) 502-2619
> >
> > Fax: (410) 614-9625
> >
> > Email: rvaradhan_at_jhmi.edu
> >
> > Webpage:
   
http://www.jhsph.edu/agingandhealth/People/Faculty/Varadhan.html
> >
> >
> >
> >


> > --------
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: r-help-bounce! s_at_r-project.org
   [mailto:r-help-bounces_at_r-project.org] On
> > Behalf Of Paul Smith
> >
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:25 PM
> > To: R-help
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [R] L-BFGS-B needs finite values of 'fn'
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Zaihra T wrote:
> > > try something like this before wrapping up your function else i guess
> > u'll
> > > have to stick to Prof Brian Ripley suggestion his suggestions are
   usually
> > > best bet .
> > >
> > > f <- function(x) {
> > >
> > > n <- length(x)
> > >
> > > r <- sum((b^(0:(n-1)))*log(x)) - 2000000*(sum(x)-k)^2
> > > if(!is.finite(r))
> > >
> > > r<-1e+20 return(r)
> > >
   &! gt; > > }
> > >
> > > have a nice day.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:24:09 +0100 "Paul Smith" wrote:
> > > > Dear All,
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to solve the optimization problem below, but I am always
> > > > getting the following error:
> > > >
> > > > Error in optim(rep(20, nvar), f, gr, method = "L-BFGS-B", lower =
   rep(0,
> > :
> > > > L-BFGS-B needs finite values of 'fn'
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------! ------
> > > >
> > > > k <- 10000
> > > > b! <- 0.3
> > > >
> > > > f <- function(x) {
> > > >
> > > > n <- length(x)
> > > >
> > > > r <- sum((b^(0:(n-1)))*log(x)) - 2000000*(sum(x)-k)^2
> > > >
> > > > return(r)
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > gr <- function(x) {
> > > >
> > > > n <- length(x)
> > > >
> > > > r <- (b^(0:(n-1)))*(1/x) - 4000000*(sum(x)-k)
> > > >
> > > > return(r)
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > nvar <- 10
> > > > (sols <-
> > > >
> > >
>>optim(rep(20,nvar),f,gr,method="L-BFGS-B",lower=rep(0,nvar),upper=rep!
   (k,nvar
> > ),control=list(fnscale=-1,parscale=rep(2000,nv
   ar),factr=1e-300,pgtol=1e-300)
> > ))
> >
> > Not much progress, Zaihra. Unfortunately! I am wondering whether one
> > can transform the original problem into an equivalent one and solvable
> > with optim.
> >
> > I know the analytical solution; I am just trying to check how far can
> > R go regarding optimization problems.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> >
> > R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
   http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> >
> >
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help_at_r-project.org! mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide

   http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Wed 02 Apr 2008 - 18:15:09 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 02 Apr 2008 - 18:30:27 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive