Re: [R] NOT-SO-SIMPLE function!

From: T.D.Rudolph <prairie.picker_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:05:49 -0700 (PDT)

You are absolutely correct Marc; thank you for making this assumption!

While it will take some time for me to rightfully understand the logical ordering of your proposed function, it certainly seems to produce the result I was looking for, and economically at that. rle is indeed highly useful in this context!

Cheers
Tyler

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NOT-SO-SIMPLE-function%21-tp17607348p17610783.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Received on Mon 02 Jun 2008 - 22:04:06 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Mon 02 Jun 2008 - 22:30:40 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive