Re: [R] round(1.5) = round(2.5) = 2?

From: Greg Snow <Greg.Snow_at_imail.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:18:48 -0600

The logic behind the round to even rule is that we are trying to represent an underlying continuous value and if x comes from a truly continuous distribution, then the probability that x==2.5 is 0 and the 2.5 was probably already rounded once from any values between 2.45 and 2.54999999999999..., if we use the round up on 0.5 rule that we learned in grade school, then the double rounding means that values between 2.45 and 2.50 will all round to 3 (having been rounded first to 2.5). This will tend to bias estimates upwards. To remove the bias we need to either go back to before the rounding to 2.5 (which is often impossible to impractical), or just round up half the time and round down half the time (or better would be to round proportional to how likely we are to see values below or above 2.5 rounded to 2.5, but that will be close to 50/50 for most underlying distributions). The stochastic approach would be to have the round function randomly choose which way to round, but deterministic types are not comforatable with that, so "round to even" was chosen (round to odd should work about the same) as a consistent rule that rounds up and down about 50/50.

If you are dealing with data where 2.5 is likely to represent an exact value (money for example), then you may do better by multiplying all values by 10 or 100 and working in integers, then converting back only for the final printing. Note that 2.50000001 rounds to 3, so if you keep more digits of accuracy until the final printing, then rounding will go in the expected direction, or you can add 0.000000001 (or other small number) to your values just before rounding, but that can bias your estimates upwards.

Hope this helps,

--
Gregory (Greg) L. Snow Ph.D.
Statistical Data Center
Intermountain Healthcare
greg.snow_at_imail.org
(801) 408-8111




> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces_at_r-project.org
> [mailto:r-help-bounces_at_r-project.org] On Behalf Of Markus Didion
> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 3:26 AM
> To: r-help_at_r-project.org
> Subject: [R] round(1.5) = round(2.5) = 2?
>
> Dear R-users
>
> with a bit of grief I had to repeat an extensive analysis
> because I did not suspect (and therefore did not read the
> documentation) that round was implemented as "for rounding
> off a 5, the IEC 60559 standard is expected to be used, 'go
> to the even digit'", resulting in
> round(1.5) = 2
> round (2.5) = 2.
>
> As a non-mathematician I am both puzzled and intrigued by
> this rule as it is against what I have learned in my math
> courses, i.e.
> round(1.5) = 2
> round (2.5) = 3.
>
> I would like to understand the reason behind this rule.
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Markus
>
> --
>
> Markus Didion
>
> Waldökologie Forest Ecology
> Inst. f. Terrestrische Oekosysteme Inst. of
> Terrestrial Ecosystems
> Departement Umweltwissenschaften Dept. of
> Environmental Sciences
> Eidg. Technische Hochschule Swiss Fed.
> Inst. of Technology
> ETH-Zentrum CHN G78 ETH-Zentrum CHN G78
> Universitätstr. 22
> Universitaetstr. 22
> CH-8092 Zürich CH-8092 Zurich
> Schweiz
> Switzerland
>
> Tel +41 (0)44 632 5629 Fax +41 (0)44 632 1358
> Email markus.didion_at_env.ethz.ch
> homepage: http://www.fe.ethz.ch/people/didionm
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
______________________________________________ R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Received on Mon 16 Jun 2008 - 16:54:26 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Mon 16 Jun 2008 - 17:30:43 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive