Re: [R] Comparison between R and MATLAB

From: Clint Bowman <clint_at_ecy.wa.gov>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:26:42 -0700 (PDT)

The easy way around that is to create an account, "Mathworks", with a common group that all who will use MatLab belong, then su - Mathworks should satisfy the license manager.

Clint Bowman			INTERNET:	clint_at_ecy.wa.gov
Air Dispersion Modeler		INTERNET:	clint_at_math.utah.edu
Air Quality Program		VOICE:		(360) 407-6815
Department of Ecology		FAX:		(360) 407-7534

	USPS:  		PO Box 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600
	Parcels:	300 Desmond Drive, Lacey, WA 98503-1274

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Earl F. Glynn wrote:

> "Shubha Vishwanath Karanth" <shubhak@ambaresearch.com> wrote in message
> news:7D44476A5833D340A0A85099D5EAD8B2832C_at_BAN-MAILSRV02.Amba.com...
> Can I get a comparison between R and MATLAB? How is R efficient than MATLAB?
> Or what are the weaknesses of R compared to MATLAB?
>
>
> Don't forget to compare licenses and cost. Matlab's rigid and unreasonable
> license is the main reason I use R now.
>
> Several years ago the Mathworks refused to let a post doc and me share a
> MatLab license -- they wanted all single-user licenses to be named users
> even if each of us only needed MatLab a few hours a month. I asked if they
> had a "math model" for what we got for a license, but they didn't care that
> there was a huge disconnect between what they wanted to sell and our usage
> needs. I quit using MatLab, converted my project from MatLab to R, and now
> steer as many people to R as possible.
>
> The Mathworks refuses to acknowledge that life-science users of math tools
> are not like physical science users. Biologists can spend weeks or months
> on experiments and then occasionally need high-end math tools for analysis.
>
> A single shared network MatLab license outside of academia is outrageously
> expensive. A single network concurrent license for Matlab and the Image
> processing, Signal Processing and PDE toolboxes costs $18,800 -- I received
> that quote just yesterday since we still have a few people that use existing
> MatLab code.
>
> MatLab may be a good product, but the Mathworks is unreasonable in how they
> license it. We are a non-profit, basic life scientific research institute
> and the Mathworks sells us the same license as for-profit businesses. Only
> degree-granting universities are eligible for academic pricing apparently.
>
> efg
> Earl F Glynn
> Bioinformatics
> Stowers Institute for Medical Research
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>



R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Sat 21 Jun 2008 - 02:25:43 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Sat 21 Jun 2008 - 04:30:45 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive