Re: [R] A regression problem using dummy variables

From: rlearner309 <unixunix99_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:38:05 -0700 (PDT)

I think the covariance between dummy variables or between dummy variables and intercept should always be zero. meaning: no sigularity problem??

rlearner309 wrote:
>
> This is actually more like a Statistics problem:
> I have a dataset with two dummy variables controlling three levels. The
> problem is, one level does not have many observations compared with other
> two levels (a couple of data points compared with 1000+ points on other
> levels). When I run the regression, the result is bad. I have unbalanced
> SE and VIF. Does this kind of problem also belong to "near sigularity"
> problem? Does it make any difference if I code the level that lacks data
> (0,0) in stead of (0,1)?
>
> thanks a lot!
>

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-regression-problem-using-dummy-variables-tp18214377p18237666.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Received on Wed 02 Jul 2008 - 14:04:18 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 02 Jul 2008 - 15:01:20 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive