Re: [Rd] Variable/function namespaces WAS: Bug in subsetting data frame (PR#13515)

From: Duncan Murdoch <>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:34:26 -0500

On 10/02/2009 12:07 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Duncan Murdoch <> wrote:

>> Stavros Macrakis wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Duncan Murdoch <>wrote:
>>>> The evaluator recognizes the context of usage and will get the
>>>> function for a function call....
>>> Can you point me to chapter and verse in the language definition...
>> No, I'm also unable to find it.

> ! This seems like a pretty fundamental thing to leave undocumented....

In open source nothing is undocumented, but sometimes the documentation is a little hard to read. I think you want to look at the section of the manual.

More seriously, I agree, but I don't have time to fix the omission. If you work out a logical (from your point of view) place to put this, and write a first draft in texinfo format, I'll put it in.

Duncan Murdoch


>> ...I think originally there was no difference, and it caused the obvious trouble when people used variable names like t and c other short function names, so this was added.  I don't remember whether the different lookup rules showed up first in R or S.

> There is an interesting discussion of these issues (in a Lisp context)
> in "Technical Issues of Separation in Function Cells and Value Cells"
> Lisp and Symbolic Computation 1:1:81 (6/1988) -- available at
> I don't
> think an R-style approach is discussed there, though.
> -s
> ______________________________________________
> mailing list
> mailing list Received on Tue 10 Feb 2009 - 22:37:04 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 11 Feb 2009 - 06:30:23 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive