Re: [Rd] 'unique' error message is printed despite silent=TRUE (PR#13547)

From: Wacek Kusnierczyk <>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:46:03 +0100

Duncan Murdoch wrote:


> On 22/02/2009 6:22 PM, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
>> well, ok, but it sounds odd to me that in a large multideveloper project
>> where not only people are allowed to use their idiosyncratic habits (and
>> leave bug-inducing footprints behind), but even the idea of having a
>> consistent way of printing debug messages seems not to have been
>> discussed (how much am i off here?).
> I think you are just trolling now. How could we stop people from
> using whatever method they wanted when debugging? And we don't
> "allow" people to leave bugs behind, but sometimes (being fallible)
> they do anyways.

i wasn't trolling, it was a genuine question. you're probably too sensitive. i don't see anything wrong in at least trying to achieve consensus on policies for how code is altered by various developers.

>> yes, though irrespectively of the consequences, it still was a bug,
>> no? (have you thanked stavros for reporting it?)
> I hope he realizes that we do appreciate the report. That's why it
> got such quick attention. (I don't expect him to thank me for fixing
> it, either.)

and why not? is it usual (an polite) to make (and express) the assumption that no one will thank you for removing a bug?

vQ mailing list Received on Mon 23 Feb 2009 - 06:50:33 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Mon 23 Feb 2009 - 07:30:30 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive