Re: [Rd] Bug in the package RODBC (PR#13745)

From: <marc_schwartz_at_me.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:20:27 +0200 (CEST)


On Jun 5, 2009, at 9:30 AM, nachikethas_at_cox.net wrote:

> Full_Name: N. Srinivasan
> Version: 2.8.1
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (68.110.225.2)
>
>
> * Installing *source* package 'RODBC' ...
> checking for gcc... gcc -std=gnu99
> checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
> checking whether the C compiler works... yes
> checking whether we are cross compiling... no
> checking for suffix of executables...
> checking for suffix of object files... o
> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
> checking whether gcc -std=gnu99 accepts -g... yes
> checking for gcc -std=gnu99 option to accept ANSI C... none needed
> checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -std=gnu99 -E
> checking for egrep... grep -E
> checking for ANSI C header files... yes
> checking for sys/types.h... yes
> checking for sys/stat.h... yes
> checking for stdlib.h... yes
> checking for string.h... yes
> checking for memory.h... yes
> checking for strings.h... yes
> checking for inttypes.h... yes
> checking for stdint.h... yes
> checking for unistd.h... yes
> checking sql.h usability... no
> checking sql.h presence... no
> checking for sql.h... no
> checking sqlext.h usability... no
> checking sqlext.h presence... no
> checking for sqlext.h... no
> configure: error: "ODBC headers sql.h and sqlext.h not found"
> ERROR: configuration failed for package 'RODBC'
> ** Removing '/home/user1/R-2.8.1/library/RODBC'
>
> The downloaded packages are in
> /tmp/RtmpmB0FH5/downloaded_packages
> Updating HTML index of packages in '.Library'
> Warning message:
> In install.packages("RODBC") :
> installation of package 'RODBC' had non-zero exit status

That's not a bug.

You are missing the required header files as noted in the error message.

You need to have unixODBC AND the unixODBC development package installed as well. The latter has the header files.

You do not indicate what Linux distribution you are using, so we are going to be limited in providing additional details for resolution.

A search of the R-Help archives would have told you the above as it has come up frequently before. It would have saved you time and would have saved a member of R Core from having to manually process a bug report that was filed in error. Next time, please search the archives or post a message to R-Help if you are unsure.

HTH, Marc Schwartz



R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Fri 05 Jun 2009 - 17:30:09 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Fri 05 Jun 2009 - 17:35:30 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive