Re: [R] popular R packages

From: hadley wickham <h.wickham_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:49:54 -0600

> More seriously : I don't think relative numbers of package downloads can
> be interpreted in any reasonable way, because reasons for package
> download have a very wide range from curiosity ("what's this ?"), fun
> (think "fortunes"...), to vital need tthink lme4 if/when a consensus on
> denominator DFs can be reached :-)...). What can you infer in good faith
> from such a mess ?

So when we have messy data with measurement error, we should just give up? Doesn't sound very statistical! ;)

Hadley

-- 
http://had.co.nz/

______________________________________________
R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Received on Sun 08 Mar 2009 - 13:52:39 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Sun 08 Mar 2009 - 14:30:24 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive