Re: [Rd] "bug report" field in DESCRIPTION file?

From: Barry Rowlingson <>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:38:14 +0000

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Duncan Murdoch <> wrote:

> This sounds like a good idea, though I would add a "package" parameter to
> the function, rather than creating a new function.

I'm sure when I did"bug") and"report") this morning I didn't see this function! Otherwise I would have suggested that."bazbrain"). Oh dear, no maintainer.

> Does the logic below sound right for with the package
> specified?
> If there's a BugReports field, calls browseURL() on that page.
> If not, it does more or less what it does now, but
> - it defaults "address" to the package maintainer. - it adds a line in the
> intro to the message pointing to the URL field if there was one.

 Martin Maechler's reservation about not being able to fill in the R details for bug reports on trackers isn't too much of a problem, since the bug tracker form could have fields for R version, session info etc, or at least a big warning saying "Please include the following info" (inside a <blink> tag).

 So how about if"foo") has a BugReports: field, you print out 'The following information may be useful to your bug report' and dump the relevant things ready for cut n paste into a bug tracker, then browseURL().

Barry mailing list Received on Thu 26 Nov 2009 - 17:40:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat 28 Nov 2009 - 22:00:51 GMT