Re: [R] Post hoc tests

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Graham Smith (myotis@cix.compulink.co.uk)
Date: Wed 28 Feb 2001 - 04:43:26 EST


Message-Id: <memo.585961@cix.compulink.co.uk>

In-Reply-To: <x24rxgo6we.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>

Peter,

>The math doesn't work out as neatly..

But does that make them invalid, Conover and others certainly present
post hoc tests for non-parametric anovas.

Cheers,

Graham S

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri 22 Jun 2001 - 18:58:34 EST