[R] RE: SCO & R

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Siddique, Amer (Amer.Siddique@ssa.gov)
Date: Sat 29 May 2004 - 01:31:17 EST


Message-id: <F151C5EFCA66314D9FE66CB7199F4AADE0F20B@sad6cd1.ch.ssa.gov>

SCO is grasping for straws. and is now gasping. vexatious lawsuits will only
drive so far before puttering out. eventually the curtain gets pulled back
on glorified attempts at racketeering. cheers.

Message: 76
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 21:08:12 -0500
From: Deepayan Sarkar <deepayan@stat.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: [R] SCO & R
To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Message-ID: <200405272108.12664.deepayan@stat.wisc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On Thursday 27 May 2004 20:18, Greg Tarpinian wrote:

> Actually, it was very recent. I pulled the electronic version of the
> article from the Forbes website:

I would think twice before taking forbes articles too seriously. For
instance, they seem to think that protecting intellectual property
rights are all right when it's some big commercial company doing the
protecting, but not when they are on the other side of the table. See
this article from last year:

http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon 31 May 2004 - 23:05:13 EST