Re: [R] a small bug in spatstat::rmh

From: Uwe Ligges <ligges_at_statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: Thu 08 Jul 2004 - 06:17:08 EST

Evgueni Parilov wrote:

> Time to time, rmh.default fails to simulate a "lookup"-type process on a
> statement:
>
> if(all.equal(diff(r),rep(deltar,nlook-1))) {
> equisp <- 1
> par <- c(beta,nlook,equisp,deltar,rmax,h)
> } else {
> equisp <- 0
> par <- c(beta,nlook,equisp,deltar,rmax,h,r)
> }
>
> According to the manual, all.equal should not be used in if-statement
> directly. This works:
> identical(all.equal(diff(r), rep(deltar, nlook - 1)),TRUE)
>
> Evgueni
>

According to library(help = spatstat), Adrian Baddeley <adrian@maths.uwa.edu.au> (in CC) is maintainer of the spatstat package - and therefore the right addressee of this message.

Uwe Ligges



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Thu Jul 08 06:21:54 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Nov 2004 - 22:54:45 EST