[R] nlm doesn't detect a gradient in my function - odd solution (bug?)

From: Andrew Robinson <andrewr_at_uidaho.edu>
Date: Wed 21 Jul 2004 - 13:28:30 EST

Dear R community,

I sent a question to the list a few days ago. Using nlm, I was unable to detect a gradient in a four-parameter function that I had written in the region that I was searching, even though the function surface clearly varied in the fourth significant figure there.

I stumbled across a peculiar solution: the nlm function was able to detect a non-zero gradient when the ndigit value was *reduced*. The default value is 12, I was able to detect a gradient in one of the four dimensions if I used 10, and in all of the four if I used 8.

Does that make any sense to anyone?



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Wed Jul 21 13:36:27 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Nov 2004 - 22:55:08 EST