RE: [R] missing values

From: falissard <falissard_b_at_wanadoo.fr>
Date: Tue 26 Apr 2005 - 20:25:45 EST


Hello,
On my experience, mice works fine with R 1.9 but not necessarily for newer versions...
Bruno



Bruno Falissard
INSERM U669, PSIGIAM
"Paris Sud Innovation Group in Adolescent Mental Health" Maison de Solenn
97 Boulevard de Port Royal
75679 Paris cedex 14, France
tel : (+33) 6 81 82 70 76
fax : (+33) 1 45 59 34 18
web site : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/bruno.falissard/
 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : r-help-bounces@stat.math.ethz.ch
[mailto:r-help-bounces@stat.math.ethz.ch] De la part de Giordano Sanchez Envoyé : mardi 26 avril 2005 11:58
À : r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Objet : Re: [R] missing values

Hello,

Thanks for the instructive responses. But two questions arise. Firstable I can't manage to load the library "mice". I'm using R 2.0.1 on my Debian

   I try just copying the package in my library /usr/lib/R/library . but when i do >library()

                        ...
                        mice       ** No title available (pre-2.0.0 
install?) **
                        ...
and when i do > library(mice)
                       Error in library(mice) : 'mice' is not a valid 
package --installed < 2.0.0?

>

The second question is more statistical: aregImpute() seems to give good results but i would like to compare the different methods not just graphically. It'is possible? I also have other meteorological stations that have correleted data with the

data station I'm using? Can I use those data to improve my imputation method.

Regards,

Giordano



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide!
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Tue Apr 26 20:38:35 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 03 Mar 2006 - 03:31:26 EST