RE: [R] (no subject)

From: Francisco J. Zagmutt <gerifalte28_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu 05 May 2005 - 06:11:07 EST


You can search on this forum for different discussions on this topic. Also, there are 2 somehow outdated publications comparing different software including SAS, SPSS and S-Plus, which might be of some use for you. The references are:

McCullough, B. D. (1998), "Assessing the reliability of statistical software: Part I", The American Statistician, 52, 358-366.

McCullough, B. D. (1999), "Assessing the reliability of statistical software: Part II", The American Statistician, 53,149-159.

I hope this helps

Francisco

>From: "rene.raupp" <rene.raupp@terra.com.br>
>To: "r-help" <r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch>
>Subject: [R] (no subject)
>Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:52:34 -0300
>
>Does anybory knows any work comparing R with other (charged) statistical
>softwares (like Minitab, SPSS, SAS)?
>I work in a brasilian government bureau and I intend to use R as our
>preferable statistical software, but I have to show it's as good as the
>others. I also intend to use Weka, and for this one I have the same
>problem.
>Can anyone help me?
>Thanks
>René M. Raupp
>e-mail: rener@mpdft.gov.br
> rene.raupp@terra.com.br
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide!
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Thu May 05 06:17:11 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 03 Mar 2006 - 03:31:35 EST