# Re: [R] over/under flow

From: William H. Asquith <wasquith_at_austin.rr.com>
Date: Mon 04 Jul 2005 - 07:00:40 EST

Great, but to followup, how do I select the bounds (B,E) on the root for an arbitrary machine?

OVER = uniroot(function(x) lgamma(x)-log(.Machine\$double.xmax), c(B,E))\$root

If uniroot() is fast enough, is it appropriate for me to set B at say 1 and E at log(.Machine\$double.max)? Suggestions on do this the proper "R way"? Perhaps this . . .

OVER = uniroot(function(x) lgamma(x)-log(.Machine\$double.xmax), c(1,log(.Machine\$double.xmax)))\$root

I am working on a package so different machines will be involved thus simple 171,172 might not be the best idea for the root?

THANKS! -wha

On Jul 3, 2005, at 3:43 PM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:

> "William H. Asquith" <wasquith@austin.rr.com> writes:
>
>> I am porting some FORTRAN to R in which an Inf triggers an if(). The
>> trigger is infinite on exp(lgamma(OVER)). What is the canonical R
>> style of determining OVER when exp(OVER)== Inf? The code structure
>> that I am
>> porting is best left intact--so I need to query R somehow to the value
>> of OVER that causes exp(lgamma(OVER)) to equal Inf.
>>
>> On my system,
>> exp(lgamma(171)) is about first to equal Inf.
>>
>> I asked similar question a few weeks ago on exp(OVER) and got the
>> answer back as log(.Machine\$double.xmax). I now have the lgamma
>> involved. I think that answer is what is OVER such the
>>
>> .Machine\$double.xmax = lgamma(OVER),
>
> Not quite... (see below)
>
>> but I am not sure how to invert or solve for OVER
>
>
>> uniroot(function(x) lgamma(x)-log(.Machine\$double.xmax), c(171,172))
> \$root
>  171.6244
>
> \$f.root
>  -1.462051e-07
>
> \$iter
>  3
>
> \$estim.prec
>  6.103516e-05
>
>
> --
> O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
> c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
> (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45)
> 35327918
> ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45)
> 35327907
>

R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list