Re: [R] Lack of independence in anova()

From: Spencer Graves <>
Date: Thu 07 Jul 2005 - 10:02:06 EST

Hi, Göran: I'll bite:

          (a) I'd like to see your counterexample.

          (b) I'd like to know what is wrong with my the following, apparently defective, proof that they can't be independent: First consider indicator functions of independent events A, B, and C.

          P{(AC)&(BC)} = P{ABC} = PA*PB*PC.           But P(AC)*P(BC) = PA*PB*(PC)^2. Thus, AC and BC can be independent only if PC = 0 or 1, i.e., the indicator of C is constant almost surely.

          Is there a flaw in this? If not, is there some reason this case cannot be extended the product of arbitrary random variables X, Y, and W=1/Z?

	  spencer graves

Göran Broström wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:06:45AM -0700, Thomas Lumley wrote:
> (...)

>> If X, Y, and Z are 
>>independent and Z takes on more than one value then X/Z and Y/Z can't be 

> Not really true. I can produce a counterexample on request (admittedly
> quite trivial though).
> Göran Broström
> ______________________________________________
> mailing list
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
Spencer Graves, PhD
Senior Development Engineer
PDF Solutions, Inc.
333 West San Carlos Street Suite 700
San Jose, CA 95110, USA <>
Tel:  408-938-4420
Fax: 408-280-7915

______________________________________________ mailing list
PLEASE do read the posting guide!
Received on Thu Jul 07 10:07:52 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 03 Mar 2006 - 03:33:18 EST