Re: [R] bug in chdir option of source

From: Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard_at_biostat.ku.dk>
Date: Tue 12 Jul 2005 - 22:10:50 EST

usenet@s-boehringer.de writes:

> I apologize for not having investigated enough.
>
> However I want to bring up the point that upgrading can be a very
> tedious thing. I administer a cluster for which upgrading brings it to a
> halt for several hours stopping all calculations going on. At the moment
> I have no way to go from 2.1.0 to 2.1.1.

Hmm, I'll believe you, but the blame for that can be shifted in various directions.

> I just want to add this point to the release policy of R which
> historically has very quick release cycles which on the one hand is a
> very positive thing but on the other hand can be problematic with
> respect to some aspects.

Actually, we have quite slow release cycles compared to other OpenSource projects. It's basically twice a year plus minor patches. According to freshmeat.net, a project's "vitality" essentially drops to zero a month after the latest release.

Now if only people would actually try the betas rather than reporting errors after the release, we'd have a much better chance of avoiding problems like yours...

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             ุster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark          Ph:  (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)                  FAX: (+45) 35327907

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
Received on Tue Jul 12 22:18:14 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 03 Mar 2006 - 03:33:33 EST